The competition in the traditional TV industry is merely a matter of hardware competition. With the popularization of the concept of smart homes, a series of intelligent industries are involved. Smart TVs, one of the most important home appliances in households, have become the main part of the living room economy. Competition point. However, smart TVs have fallen into a situation of internal and external troubles. There are old and new brands in the game. The external smart projectors and the siege of VR devices all try to subvert the status of smart TVs. Although the projector can create a cinema-like enjoyment, although VR is now so hot, but want to eat a smart TV that is in its peak period, it is easier said than done!
Can VR subvert the traditional TV industry?
Since there are many similarities between projections and TVs, we are the first to discuss the more significant differences in VR. In 2016, people fully felt the novelty brought about by technology. An artificial intelligence, a virtual reality (VR), took turns to grab the headlines of major technology media. Consumers are also enthusiastic, especially in recent VR devices that can watch movies. Tens of thousands of geeks are thrilled. With a unique viewing style and a thrilling experience, VR has capital to subvert the traditional way of viewing. Its main target is television.
VR immersive experience spike TV
As for what is VR in the end, presumably we have been brainwashed enough times recently, the author will not go into details, its biggest feature is a full range of immersive experience, which is a far more than the appearance of surface television Feelings, so that you are completely exposed to the virtual scene you see, very real. This is why many VR enthusiasts or game lovers indulge in this. It must be admitted that the viewing experience of VR is definitely a spike TV, but can it really replace TV and dominate the living room? Non-also not!
Of course, the question of whether or not VR can replace television must be furthered in the future. After all, VR has only just begun. Resources and equipment are not ideal enough. This is unfair compared to television. But even if these problems are ruled out, VR still has pain points that cannot be solved.
Insufficient popularity of VR
The immersive feeling of VR is shocking, but it is not suitable for everyone, such as children. Due to the fact that the visual effects brought by VR devices are too real, the child's mind is not yet mature. As the intense video may not be able to accept stimulation and the ability to discriminate is weak, the true and virtual world cannot be clearly distinguished at all times. Its growth. For this, many VR device manufacturers such as Sony and HTC have posted statements that children under the age of 13 are not suitable for using VR devices.
Children are not suitable for VR
In addition to children, the elderly and people with poor mental abilities may not accept the VR device's overly stimulating picture. Given these restrictions on use, VR is destined to become a toy for some people, and it is impossible to reach the status of millions of households instead of smart TVs. In contrast, people like smart TVs have been accustomed to watching movies for decades and are more suitable for popularization.
Not suitable for prolonged use
Basically, VR devices are head-mounted, giving people a sense of restraint from the beginning. If you wear them for a long time, you will feel obvious discomfort. A slight amount of products will feel uncomfortable. The author experienced several VR products, you can clearly feel the discomfort caused by wearing a headset, especially girls, not to wear a clunky guy for a long time, that drama is how much a test of the body.
Many people use VR will be dizzy, nausea
In addition, many people experience VR products, especially in fierce pictures or game scenes, prone to dizziness, and even nausea symptoms. The principle of VR dizzy is actually very simple, because the (VR) picture seen by the eye does not match the (real position) information received from the ear, resulting in an increase in brain burden and causing a dizziness. In summary, VR products are not suitable for long-term use by most people, and VR has a much bigger burden on the eyes than TV. This is one of the biggest challenges for VR to occupy the living room.
TV is more like life, VR is more emphasis on entertainment
In fact, over the years, TV is no longer just a simple home entertainment tool, but also can become a medium for communication and communication in the family. A family sitting around the TV, watching TV, watching the Spring Festival Evening, enjoyable, this is a beautiful life that every family yearns for. The VR device is to create a closed environment for people, to show you a virtual environment, almost completely cut off the communication with the outside world, which is not in line with the concept of the living room as a family center of life, this point VR can not play a smart TV character of.
Watching TV with family is fun for family life
Guests visit and greet in the sitting room while watching TV. This is the normal way of hospitality. Imagine, if VR really replaced the TV, a friend came to visit, directly handed over a VR, this can chat, talk it? This is completely an anti-human application. Look at this point of view. VR is more of a personal entertainment product and cannot be the center of the living room.
VR Cinema or Become a Supplement to Smart TV
Having said so much, VR products want to subvert the position of smart TVs. The future that the author can see is estimated to be no more. In addition to personal toys, VR cinema is one of the more promising markets for VR products. Just like today's 3D cinema, the appearance of VR cinemas seems to have begun to show signs. Theater and home environment are different. Consumers simply go to the movies and enjoy movies. This is exactly what VR can show.
VR theater will be a very good place
In the increasingly fiery stage of VR, many smart TV manufacturers have also joined the camp. Including traditional TV maker Skyworth and internet TV brands like LeTV, micro-whale, and storm, Skyworth said that Skyworth is not a cross-border when it officially announces its entry into the VR field. It is only for the purpose of applying VR technology to television for a more perfect viewing. Experience. Just as in previous 3D TVs, it seems that the application of VR in the TV field will not follow the footsteps of 3D TV.
Summary: Although the VR viewing experience is cool, it is almost impossible to subvert the smart TV industry at least for now. The TV industry seems to be a popular area, but it is only such a popular product that everyone can enjoy. There are also harsh conditions, conditions, and usage habits, and the threshold is even higher. Although VR cannot subvert the smart TV, it may be able to give new impetus to the development of smart TV technology.
Unlike VR products, projection has a lot in common with TV. In addition to the different screen display methods, the others are not really different. In pursuit of a giant screen viewing experience, projectors have become a more cost-effective alternative to television. Earlier, due to various problems, television and projectors occupied different areas of home and business, and the two industries that appeared to be not in river water became direct competitors with technological development.
Home smart projector increasingly cost-effective
Projection is no longer so expensive, the problem of short life span has also been solved, and the troubles of previous home projectors needing to be installed and wired have disappeared from the mainstream smart projectors nowadays. The most important thing is that the picture quality also has Great improvement. The TV industry has been making progress without a doubt. Smart TVs have become larger, thinner, and cheaper. The combination of the TV box and the projector became a smart projector, officially declaring a battle for smart TVs for the economic center of the living room. It seems that the smart projection to this really has the ability to subvert the smart TV, this problem may have a big controversy, but I think the status of smart TV in the family is still unshakable.
Smart projectors are subject to greater environmental interference during use
When watching a movie in a movie theater, the effects of the screen are very different under the conditions of turning on the lights and turning off the lights. This is also a common problem in projectors. In the daily living room environment, the display effect displayed by the projection is not as good as the TV. Is it too difficult to watch the movie in the daytime? Obviously this is not realistic. In terms of screen brightness, the TV's performance is significantly more stable.
The projector display is susceptible to environmental interference
In addition to the light factor, for ordinary families who need to project, they must have a qualified wall or curtain as the screen. At the same time, the projection distance and the height of the projector must be considered. This is more troublesome than the TV. Far more, it will even affect the layout of your living room.
The giant screen is shocking but the screen is not delicate enough
The most appealing aspect of home smart projection vs. smart TVs is the ability to create a cinema-like giant-screen viewing experience that is unmatched by television. But the screen is big and the problem of clarity is exposed. Nowadays, the mainstream smart projection resolution can only reach 1080P, and the 4K resolution on smart TVs has long been popular, and the projectors support 4K resolution products are not without, but the high price and its commercial positioning, home Not suitable. In addition, the smart projector is slightly weaker in terms of color and brightness performance, and the eyes are prone to fatigue due to prolonged viewing.
4K TV has long been popular, while the mainstream projection is still 1080P
Since we talk about the relationship between television and projection, let's talk about the problem of laser television! In fact, laser television is essentially an ultra-short focal projector screen sound, which means that it is only a deformed body of a smart projector. To be honest, the 100-inch laser TV is the largest size television I have ever seen, so I'm curious about how it looks. The actual experience, the screen brightness is still flawed, in the 100-inch screen resolution 1080P resolution is not enough clear problem is also a little obvious, but if you ignore these resolution issues, 100-inch viewing experience is still quite Shocking, after all, how many people in the cinema watching movies will care about how much the resolution?
TV display technology development brings a better experience
Summary: TV occupies people's lives for several decades, and more is a continuation of a habit. At the same time, the development of smart TV screen technology also makes the use experience better and better, and the user is more sticky. For smart projectors, it is still a relatively avant-garde option, but it is still too early to talk about replacing television. Coexistence and development may be the best way now and in the future. Therefore, the choice of smart TV and smart projector depends on what the user needs more. So, how do you choose to confuse users who choose smart TVs or mainstream smart projectors?
1, for the pursuit of giant screen cinematic experience is not particularly concerned about the quality of the user, the mainstream smart projector is the first choice;
2. For users who have long played dramas, watch games, have high requirements for picture quality, or have limited home space, it is more reliable to choose smart TVs honestly. Nowadays, the 65-inch 4K smart TV has fallen to the lowest price of 3,999 yuan. The threshold for large-screen TVs has been getting lower and lower.
to sum up:
They all think about killing smart TVs. It can be seen that the value of the living room economy has a lot of temptation. However, it seems that products that can end smart TVs do not seem to have yet been born. VR and projection have not completely replaced the great advantages of smart TVs. Apply different scenes or technically achieve mutual remedy.
Smart TV/box information can focus on smart TV information network sofa butler (http://), China's influential TV box and smart TV website, providing information, communication, TV boxes, smart TVs, smart TV software, etc. Answering questions.
Since there are many similarities between projections and TVs, we are the first to discuss the more significant differences in VR. In 2016, people fully felt the novelty brought about by technology. An artificial intelligence, a virtual reality (VR), took turns to grab the headlines of major technology media. Consumers are also enthusiastic, especially in recent VR devices that can watch movies. Tens of thousands of geeks are thrilled. With a unique viewing style and a thrilling experience, VR has capital to subvert the traditional way of viewing. Its main target is television.
VR immersive experience spike TV
As for what is VR in the end, presumably we have been brainwashed enough times recently, the author will not go into details, its biggest feature is a full range of immersive experience, which is a far more than the appearance of surface television Feelings, so that you are completely exposed to the virtual scene you see, very real. This is why many VR enthusiasts or game lovers indulge in this. It must be admitted that the viewing experience of VR is definitely a spike TV, but can it really replace TV and dominate the living room? Non-also not!
Of course, the question of whether or not VR can replace television must be furthered in the future. After all, VR has only just begun. Resources and equipment are not ideal enough. This is unfair compared to television. But even if these problems are ruled out, VR still has pain points that cannot be solved.
Insufficient popularity of VR
The immersive feeling of VR is shocking, but it is not suitable for everyone, such as children. Due to the fact that the visual effects brought by VR devices are too real, the child's mind is not yet mature. As the intense video may not be able to accept stimulation and the ability to discriminate is weak, the true and virtual world cannot be clearly distinguished at all times. Its growth. For this, many VR device manufacturers such as Sony and HTC have posted statements that children under the age of 13 are not suitable for using VR devices.
Children are not suitable for VR
In addition to children, the elderly and people with poor mental abilities may not accept the VR device's overly stimulating picture. Given these restrictions on use, VR is destined to become a toy for some people, and it is impossible to reach the status of millions of households instead of smart TVs. In contrast, people like smart TVs have been accustomed to watching movies for decades and are more suitable for popularization.
Not suitable for prolonged use
Basically, VR devices are head-mounted, giving people a sense of restraint from the beginning. If you wear them for a long time, you will feel obvious discomfort. A slight amount of products will feel uncomfortable. The author experienced several VR products, you can clearly feel the discomfort caused by wearing a headset, especially girls, not to wear a clunky guy for a long time, that drama is how much a test of the body.
Many people use VR will be dizzy, nausea
In addition, many people experience VR products, especially in fierce pictures or game scenes, prone to dizziness, and even nausea symptoms. The principle of VR dizzy is actually very simple, because the (VR) picture seen by the eye does not match the (real position) information received from the ear, resulting in an increase in brain burden and causing a dizziness. In summary, VR products are not suitable for long-term use by most people, and VR has a much bigger burden on the eyes than TV. This is one of the biggest challenges for VR to occupy the living room.
TV is more like life, VR is more emphasis on entertainment
In fact, over the years, TV is no longer just a simple home entertainment tool, but also can become a medium for communication and communication in the family. A family sitting around the TV, watching TV, watching the Spring Festival Evening, enjoyable, this is a beautiful life that every family yearns for. The VR device is to create a closed environment for people, to show you a virtual environment, almost completely cut off the communication with the outside world, which is not in line with the concept of the living room as a family center of life, this point VR can not play a smart TV character of.
Watching TV with family is fun for family life
Guests visit and greet in the sitting room while watching TV. This is the normal way of hospitality. Imagine, if VR really replaced the TV, a friend came to visit, directly handed over a VR, this can chat, talk it? This is completely an anti-human application. Look at this point of view. VR is more of a personal entertainment product and cannot be the center of the living room.
VR Cinema or Become a Supplement to Smart TV
Having said so much, VR products want to subvert the position of smart TVs. The future that the author can see is estimated to be no more. In addition to personal toys, VR cinema is one of the more promising markets for VR products. Just like today's 3D cinema, the appearance of VR cinemas seems to have begun to show signs. Theater and home environment are different. Consumers simply go to the movies and enjoy movies. This is exactly what VR can show.
VR theater will be a very good place
In the increasingly fiery stage of VR, many smart TV manufacturers have also joined the camp. Including traditional TV maker Skyworth and internet TV brands like LeTV, micro-whale, and storm, Skyworth said that Skyworth is not a cross-border when it officially announces its entry into the VR field. It is only for the purpose of applying VR technology to television for a more perfect viewing. Experience. Just as in previous 3D TVs, it seems that the application of VR in the TV field will not follow the footsteps of 3D TV.
Summary: Although the VR viewing experience is cool, it is almost impossible to subvert the smart TV industry at least for now. The TV industry seems to be a popular area, but it is only such a popular product that everyone can enjoy. There are also harsh conditions, conditions, and usage habits, and the threshold is even higher. Although VR cannot subvert the smart TV, it may be able to give new impetus to the development of smart TV technology.
Unlike VR products, projection has a lot in common with TV. In addition to the different screen display methods, the others are not really different. In pursuit of a giant screen viewing experience, projectors have become a more cost-effective alternative to television. Earlier, due to various problems, television and projectors occupied different areas of home and business, and the two industries that appeared to be not in river water became direct competitors with technological development.
Projection is no longer so expensive, the problem of short life span has also been solved, and the troubles of previous home projectors needing to be installed and wired have disappeared from the mainstream smart projectors nowadays. The most important thing is that the picture quality also has Great improvement. The TV industry has been making progress without a doubt. Smart TVs have become larger, thinner, and cheaper. The combination of the TV box and the projector became a smart projector, officially declaring a battle for smart TVs for the economic center of the living room. It seems that the smart projection to this really has the ability to subvert the smart TV, this problem may have a big controversy, but I think the status of smart TV in the family is still unshakable.
Smart projectors are subject to greater environmental interference during use
When watching a movie in a movie theater, the effects of the screen are very different under the conditions of turning on the lights and turning off the lights. This is also a common problem in projectors. In the daily living room environment, the display effect displayed by the projection is not as good as the TV. Is it too difficult to watch the movie in the daytime? Obviously this is not realistic. In terms of screen brightness, the TV's performance is significantly more stable.
The projector display is susceptible to environmental interference
In addition to the light factor, for ordinary families who need to project, they must have a qualified wall or curtain as the screen. At the same time, the projection distance and the height of the projector must be considered. This is more troublesome than the TV. Far more, it will even affect the layout of your living room.
The giant screen is shocking but the screen is not delicate enough
The most appealing aspect of home smart projection vs. smart TVs is the ability to create a cinema-like giant-screen viewing experience that is unmatched by television. But the screen is big and the problem of clarity is exposed. Nowadays, the mainstream smart projection resolution can only reach 1080P, and the 4K resolution on smart TVs has long been popular, and the projectors support 4K resolution products are not without, but the high price and its commercial positioning, home Not suitable. In addition, the smart projector is slightly weaker in terms of color and brightness performance, and the eyes are prone to fatigue due to prolonged viewing.
4K TV has long been popular, while the mainstream projection is still 1080P
Since we talk about the relationship between television and projection, let's talk about the problem of laser television! In fact, laser television is essentially an ultra-short focal projector screen sound, which means that it is only a deformed body of a smart projector. To be honest, the 100-inch laser TV is the largest size television I have ever seen, so I'm curious about how it looks. The actual experience, the screen brightness is still flawed, in the 100-inch screen resolution 1080P resolution is not enough clear problem is also a little obvious, but if you ignore these resolution issues, 100-inch viewing experience is still quite Shocking, after all, how many people in the cinema watching movies will care about how much the resolution?
TV display technology development brings a better experience
Summary: TV occupies people's lives for several decades, and more is a continuation of a habit. At the same time, the development of smart TV screen technology also makes the use experience better and better, and the user is more sticky. For smart projectors, it is still a relatively avant-garde option, but it is still too early to talk about replacing television. Coexistence and development may be the best way now and in the future. Therefore, the choice of smart TV and smart projector depends on what the user needs more. So, how do you choose to confuse users who choose smart TVs or mainstream smart projectors?
1, for the pursuit of giant screen cinematic experience is not particularly concerned about the quality of the user, the mainstream smart projector is the first choice;
2. For users who have long played dramas, watch games, have high requirements for picture quality, or have limited home space, it is more reliable to choose smart TVs honestly. Nowadays, the 65-inch 4K smart TV has fallen to the lowest price of 3,999 yuan. The threshold for large-screen TVs has been getting lower and lower.
to sum up:
They all think about killing smart TVs. It can be seen that the value of the living room economy has a lot of temptation. However, it seems that products that can end smart TVs do not seem to have yet been born. VR and projection have not completely replaced the great advantages of smart TVs. Apply different scenes or technically achieve mutual remedy.
Smart TV/box information can focus on smart TV information network sofa butler (http://), China's influential TV box and smart TV website, providing information, communication, TV boxes, smart TVs, smart TV software, etc. Answering questions.